Stalking Injunctions for Protection

Allegations of stalking can result in the following:

This article explains what happens when you are served with a petition for a civil injunction for protection from stalking.

Section 784.0485(1), Florida Statutes, establishes a cause of action for an injunction for protection against stalking. Stalking occurs when a person “willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person.” § 784.048(2).

Each incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support an injunction against stalking.

Since the temporary injunction for protection against stalking is issued without any notice to the Respondent, the parties must appear and testify at a hearing (called the “return hearing”).

Under Section 784.0485(5)(c) of the stalking statute, the final hearing must be held within fifteen (15) days unless good cause is shown for a continuance.

Because it also takes time for the Respondent to be served with the temporary injunction, the Respondent may only have a few days to prepare for the return hearing. The purpose of the return hearing is for the judge to decide whether or not to issue a final injunction.

The attorneys at Sammis Law Firm deal with this issue by filing a motion to continue the hearing and serving the Petitioner with a notice that we want to take the Petitioner’s deposition a week later.

Then at the return hearing, we tell the judge that we served the petitioner with the subpoena for the deposition scheduled in one week and ask for a continuance until after the deposition.

If the request is granted, the judge will continue the temporary injunction for a few weeks, giving the Respondent time to prepare for the hearing.

Attorney for Stalking Protection Orders in Tampa, FL

If you were served with a “Temporary Injunction for Protection Against Stalking” under Florida Statute Section 784.0485, and wish to contest the allegations, call an experienced attorney in Tampa, Hillsborough County, FL, at Sammis Law Firm.

Our attorneys are experienced in representing respondents who wish to contest false or exaggerated allegations of stalking.

We help our clients show that the allegations are unfounded so that the judge does not grant the final injunction.

Keep in mind that injunction hearings are quasi-criminal proceedings that come with severe consequences that last a lifetime.

Don’t face the judge alone. Call us to discuss your best defense against unfounded allegations of stalking and the request for an injunction for protection (often called a “restraining order.”)

Our attorneys represent the respondents at these hearings for injunctions for protection against stalking in the courthouses in Tampa and Plant City in Hillsborough County, FL. We also represent clients in Pasco County, Pinellas County, and Hernando County, FL.

Call (813) 250-0500 to discuss your case today.


Hearings for Protection from Stalking in Hillsborough County, FL

The return hearings for injunctions for protection in Hillsborough County, FL, can be heard at the courthouse in Tampa or Plant City.

  • DIV G – Edgecomb Courthouse, Courtroom 302, 800 E. Twiggs St., Tampa, FL 33602
  • DIV H – Edgecomb Courthouse, Courtroom 303, 800 E. Twiggs St., Tampa, FL 33602
  • DIV S – Plant City Courthouse – Courtroom 1, 301 Michigan Avenue, Plant City, FL 33563
  • DIV V – Plant City Courthouse – Courtroom 3, 301 Michigan Avenue, Plant City, FL 33563

At Sammis Law Firm, we have offices in downtown Tampa, FL. We also have offices in New Port Richey and help clients fight petitions for protection from stalking in Pasco County, FL.

We also have offices in Clearwater and help clients fight petitions for protection from stalking in Pinellas County, FL.


Form 12.980(t) – Petitions for Protection Injunction against Stalking

The Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Form 12.980(t), Petition for Injunction for Protection against Stalking was approved in May of 2013. Section 4 of the form provides:

Petitioner is a victim of stalking because Respondent has:
{please mark all sections that apply}

  • Destroyed personal property, including, but not limited to, telephones or other communication equipment, clothing, or other items belonging to Petitioner;
  • Another order of protection issued against him or her previously from another jurisdiction, if known;
  • A criminal history involving violence or the threat or violence, if known;
  • Used, or threatened to use, against Petitioner any weapons such as guns or knives;
  • Intentionally injured or killed a family pet;
  • Threatened to harm Petitioner or family members or individuals closely associated with Petitioner;
  • Previously threatened, harassed, stalked, cyberstalked, or physically abused the Petitioner; or
  • Committed stalking.

Description of Stalking and Cyberstalking Incidents

Under Florida law, Section 5 calls for a description of the specific incidents of stalking or cyberstalking.

The form directs the petitioner with allegations of cyberstalking to “please include a description of all evidence of contacts and/or threats made by Respondent in voice messages, texts, emails, or other electronic communication.”

The form also provides a space for the petitioner to list the date and describe incidents of stalking and the location in which the stalking incidents occurred. The form notes that the locations may include, but need not be limited to, a home, school, or place of employment.


Who Has Standing for a Stalking Injunction for Protection?

The court may not issue mutual orders of protection; however, the court is not precluded from issuing separate injunctions for protection against stalking. §784.0485(1)(e), Florida Statutes.

The fact that a separate order of protection is granted to each opposing party is not legally sufficient to deny any remedy to either party or to prove that the parties are equally at fault or equally endangered. §784.0485(6)(d), Florida Statutes.

The injunction for protection may be sought regardless of whether any other cause of action is currently pending between the parties and may be sought by any affected person. §784.0485(1)(b-c), Florida Statutes.


Filing a Stalking Injunction on Behalf of a Child

A person who is the victim of stalking or the parent or legal guardian of a minor child who is living at home who seeks an injunction for protection against stalking on behalf of the minor child has standing in the circuit court to file a sworn petition for an injunction for protection against stalking. §784.0485(1)(a), Florida Statutes.


Venue in a Stalking Injunction for Protection Case

The venue for the stalking injunction controls which county should hear the case. A petition for an injunction for protection against stalking may be filed in the circuit where:

  • the petitioner currently or temporarily resides;
  • where the respondent resides; or
  • where the stalking occurred.

Florida law provides no minimum residency requirement to petition for an injunction for protection. §784.0485(1)(f), Florida Statutes.


Definitions Used in Stalking Injunction for Protection Hearings

The criminal charge of stalking is an allegation that a person willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly followed, harassed, or cyberstalked another person. Stalking is a misdemeanor of the first degree under Florida Statute §784.048(2).

The crime of stalking is elevated to a third degree felony for aggravated stalking if the person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person, also makes a credible threat to that person.

Aggravated Stalking is a felony of the third degree under Florida Statute §784.048(3).

“Cyberstalk” means to engage in a course of conduct to communicate, or to cause to be communicated, words, images, or language by or through the use of electronic mail or electronic communication directed at a specific person, causing substantial emotional distress to that person and serving no legitimate purpose. §784.048(1)(a-d), Florida Statutes.

“Harass” means to engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific person which causes substantial emotional distress to that person and serves no legitimate purpose. “[T]he statutory definition of ‘domestic violence’ requires some showing of violence or a threat of violence[,] general harassment does not suffice.” Young v. Smith, 901 So.2d 372, 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

“Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, which evidences a continuity of purpose.

“Credible threat” means a verbal or nonverbal threat, or a combination of the two, including threats delivered by electronic communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the person who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely associated with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat to cause such harm.

Under Florida law, it is not necessary to prove that the person making the threat intends to carry it out. The present incarceration of the person making the threat is not a bar to prosecution.


Determining Whether the Purpose for Contact is Legitimate

Whether the purpose for contact is “legitimate” is evaluated case-by-case. The courts in Florida have acknowledged that the term “legitimate” seems to lack a precise definition. The courts have, however, generally held that contact is legitimate when there is a reason for the contact other than to harass the victim.
In O’Neill v. Goodwin, 195 So. 3d 411, 413–14 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), an individual who was featured in a filmmaker’s documentary filed a petition for an injunction for protection against stalking, alleging that the filmmaker had threatened to harm her or her family members, and cyberstalked her social media account and stole pictures she had posted. The parties agreed that the communication by the filmmaker was intended to inform her of the pending documentary. Although the creation of this documentary was unwelcome, alerting the individual to its existence was a legitimate reason for contact. The trial court’s decision to grant an injunction for protection against stalking was reversed because the record lacked competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that it was not for a legitimate purpose.
In Alter v. Paquette, 98 So.3d 218 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), the Second District Court of Appeal found that seven text messages seeking the repayment of a loan were insufficient to support a finding of stalking as “it cannot be said that the text messages served ‘no legitimate purpose.’” Id. at 220.
In Poindexter v. Springer, 898 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), an inmate hired a private investigator to gather evidence for post-conviction relief after a criminal conviction. Id. at 205. When the investigator declined the work request, she resigned and returned part of the money paid. The inmate then complained to the investigator’s licensing board, filed a suit in court, threatened to send letters to area attorneys complaining about the investigator’s work, and sent a letter to the investigator threatening to sue her if she did not continue the requested work. Id. at 205–06. The Second District Court of Appeal held that the letter threatening to sue “served a legitimate purpose and therefore could not be included in the definition of harassment.” Id. at 207.
In Goudy v. Duquette, 112 So.3d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), a parent called a dance instructor to explain why he was dissatisfied with the instructor’s decisions regarding his daughter’s participation on the dance team. Id. at 717. The court held that “this was a legitimate purpose.” Id. The court also found that the parent’s appearance “at the dance team competition location, the team’s hotel, and a nearby restaurant” served legitimate purposes. Id.
In Leach v. Kersey, 162 So.3d 1104, 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), the Second District Court of Appeal held that phone calls, messages, and “friend” requests on Facebook were not grounds for an injunction against stalking when made “for the legitimate purpose” of telling the petitioner to stay away from the defendant’s husband, with whom the petitioner had been having an affair when the contacts by the defendant were in response to an attempt by the petitioner to talk to the husband.

The Return Hearing in a Stalking Injunction for Protection Case

Florida law requires the court to set a return hearing to be held as soon as possible. The respondent must then be personally served with a copy of the petition, notice of hearing, and temporary injunction, if any, before the hearing under Florida Statute §784.0485(4).

The ex parte temporary injunction is effective for a fixed period not to exceed 15 days. A full hearing shall be set no later than when the temporary injunction ceases to be effective.

The court may grant a continuance of the hearing before or during a hearing for a good cause shown by any party, which shall include a continuance to obtain service of process.

An injunction shall be extended if necessary to remain in full force and effect during any period of continuance under Florida Statute §784.0485(5)(c).


The Respondent Must be Served with the Stalking Injunction for Protection

If an injunction is issued and the petitioner requests the assistance of a law enforcement agency, the court may order that an officer from the appropriate law enforcement agency accompany the petitioner to assist in the execution or service of the injunction.

A law enforcement officer shall accept a copy of an injunction for protection against stalking, certified by the clerk of the court, from the petitioner and immediately serve it upon a respondent who has been located but not yet served under Florida Statute §784.048(8)(a)(2).


What Happens if the Judge Issues a Stalking Temporary Injunction for Protection?

If it appears to the court that stalking exists, the court may grant a temporary injunction ex parte, pending a full hearing.

It may grant such relief as the court deems proper, including an injunction restraining the respondent from committing any act of stalking under Florida Statute §784.0485(5)(a).

Evidence other than verified pleadings or affidavits may not be used as evidence unless the respondent appears at the hearing or has received reasonable notice of the hearing.


What Relief Can the Court Grant in the Temporary Injunction?

The court has broad discretion in granting relief in a temporary injunction, including any relief the court deems proper.

Under Florida Statute §784.0485(6)(a), the court can order such other relief as the court deems necessary for the protection of a victim of stalking, including injunctions or directives to law enforcement agencies. Relief can include:

  • Restraining the respondent from committing any act of stalking;
  • Ordering the respondent to participate in treatment, intervention, or counseling services to be paid for by the respondent;
  • Referring a petitioner to appropriate services; and
  • The court may provide the petitioner with a list of certified domestic violence centers, certified rape crisis centers, and other appropriate referrals in the circuit that the petitioner may contact.

The terms of the injunction for protection will remain in effect until modified or dissolved. The petitioner or respondent can move at any time to modify or dissolve the injunction under Florida Statute §784.0485(6)(b).


Terms of the Stalking Injunction for Protection

A temporary or final judgment on injunction for protection against stalking will indicate on its face the following terms:

  • The injunction is valid and enforceable in all counties of this state;
  • Law enforcement officers may use their arrest powers to enforce the terms of the injunction;
  • The court has jurisdiction over the parties and matters under the laws of this state, and that reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard was given to the person against whom the order is sought sufficient to protect that person’s right to due process; and
  • The date the respondent was served with the temporary or final order, if obtainable under Florida Statute §784.0485(6)(c).

Prohibition Against Possession of a Firearm after an Order of Protection

The Florida legislature regulates firearms in Chapter 790, Florida Statutes.

For instance, a final judgment on an injunction for protection against stalking must, on its face, provide that it is a violation of §790.233 and a misdemeanor of the first degree for the respondent to have in his or her care, custody, possession, or control any firearm or ammunition. §784.0485(6)(e), Florida Statutes.

A person may not have in his or her care, custody, possession, or control any firearm or ammunition if the person has been issued a final injunction that is currently in force and effect, restraining that person from committing acts of domestic violence, or from committing acts of stalking or cyberstalking or they commit a misdemeanor of the first degree. §790.233(1-2), Florida Statutes.

Therefore, if a final injunction for stalking is in effect, a person may not possess firearms or ammunition, and violating this provision is a crime.

Section 784.0485(6)(e) provides, in turn, that “[a] final judgment on an injunction for protection against stalking entered under this section must, on its face, provide that it is a violation of s. 790.233 and a misdemeanor of the first degree for the respondent to have in his or her care, custody, possession, or control any firearm or ammunition.”

But neither section 790.233 nor section 784.0485 provide express statutory authority for a court to prohibit a person from possessing firearms or ammunition upon issuing a temporary injunction for protection against stalking.

As a result, the courts do not have the express authority to prohibit the possession of firearms and ammunition based on the temporary injunction for stalking.


Hearing for a Final Injunction in Stalking Cases

As a part of any sentence, the sentencing court shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim, which may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court.

The Florida Legislature intended that the length of any such order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations by the perpetrator, and the safety of the victim and his or her family members or individuals closely associated with the victim. See Florida Statute §784.048(9)(a).


What Happens After a Violation of the Stalking Injunction for Injunction?

The court may enforce a violation of an injunction through a civil or criminal contempt proceeding, or the state attorney may prosecute it as a criminal violation. §784.048(9)(a), Florida Statutes.

If a law enforcement officer arrests the respondent for a violation, the respondent shall be held in custody until brought before the court as expeditiously as possible for the purpose of enforcing the injunction and for admittance to bail pending a hearing. §784.048(9)(b), Florida Statutes.


Other Cases Involving a Stalking Injunction Reversed on Appeal

In Burns v. Bockorick, __ So. 3d __, 2017 WL 2562423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), the appellate court reversed a stalking injunction entered by the lower court. In that case, the judge entered an injunction against stalking after the parties agreed to the terms. But there was no stipulated evidence of stalking entered during the case.

Although the respondent had agreed to stop contacting the petitioner, he never admitted to stalking her. He asked for a rehearing, which was denied without explanation by the court. The appellate court held that the trial court erred since there was no evidence of stalking and no stipulation to evidence of stalking.

The court further held that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for rehearing and remanded the case for a full evidentiary hearing. The court also reminded trial judges that injunctions could have serious consequences.

For example, under § 790.233, Fla. Stat. (2016), Florida provides that individuals against whom a section 784.0485 injunction is entered may not possess a firearm or ammunition.

Under § 784.0485(9)(a), Florida law provides that a violation of an injunction for protection may be enforced through a civil or criminal contempt proceeding or prosecuted as a criminal violation.

“The Florida Criminal Code authorizes circuit courts to issue temporary injunctions against stalking, but it contemplates a ‘full hearing’ before a permanent injunction may be entered.” Ceelen v. Grant, 210 So. 3d 128, 129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (citing § 784.0485(5)(c)(1)).

“In order to be entitled to an injunction for stalking, the petitioner must allege and prove two separate instances of stalking.” David v. Schack, 192 So. 3d 625, 627-28 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

In Touhey v. Seda, 133 So. 3d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), the court required that “[e]ach incident of stalking must be proven by competent, substantial evidence to support an injunction against stalking.”


First Degree Misdemeanor for Violation of Stalking Injunction

The criminal defense attorneys at the Sammis Law Firm also represent clients charged with stalking or aggravated stalking in Tampa, FL, and the surrounding Tampa Bay areas.

We represent clients throughout Hillsborough County, Pinellas County, Pasco County, Hernando County, and Polk County, FL.

A person who willfully violates an injunction for protection against stalking or cyberstalking or a foreign protection order accorded full faith and credit commits a misdemeanor of the first degree by:

  • Going to, or being within 500 feet of, the petitioner’s residence, school, place of employment, or a specified place frequented regularly by the petitioner and any named family members or individuals closely associated with the petitioner;
  • Committing an act of stalking against the petitioner;
  • Committing any other violation of the injunction through an intentional unlawful threat, word, or act to do violence to the petitioner;
  • Telephoning, contacting, or otherwise communicating with the petitioner, directly or indirectly, unless the injunction specifically allows indirect contact through a third party;
  • Knowingly and intentionally coming within 100 feet of the petitioner’s motor vehicle, whether or not that vehicle is occupied;
  • Defacing or destroying the petitioner’s personal property, including the petitioner’s motor vehicle; or
  • Refusing to surrender firearms or ammunition if ordered to do so by the court. §784.0487(4)(a-g), Florida Statutes.

Types of Felony Charges for Stalking

Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses or cyberstalks another person, and makes a credible threat to that person with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury of the person, or the person’s child, sibling, spouse, parent, or dependent, commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, §784.048(3), Florida Statutes.

Any person who, after an injunction for protection against repeat violence, sexual violence, or dating violence, or an injunction for protection against domestic violence, or after any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward the subject person or that person’s property, knowingly, willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree. §784.048(4), Florida Statutes.

Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks a child minor under 16 years of age commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree. §784.048(5), Florida Statutes.

Any person who has been sentenced and prohibited from contacting the victim and willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks the victim commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree. §784.048(7), Florida Statutes.


Additional Resources for Stalking Protection Injunctions

Domestic Violence Resources – City of Tampa – Information on filing for a petition for injunction in Hillsborough County, Florida, by going to the courthouse, Clerk of the Circuit Court’s Office.

Domestic Violence FAQ – Clerk of Circuit Court, Hillsborough County – Find information on Injunctions for Protection Against Domestic Violence, Repeat Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Violence, and Stalking Violence.


Finding a Lawyer for Stalking Injunction in Tampa, FL

If you were served with a temporary order and injunction for protection against stalking, contact an experienced criminal defense attorney at Sammis Law Firm.

Our attorneys represent respondents who wish to contest false or exaggerated allegations so that the court ultimately grants no final injunction for protection.

We also represent clients charged with the criminal offense of stalking or aggravated stalking. More and more of these cases involve allegations of cyberstalking online or through social media platforms.

Even installing a tracking device or tracking application without consent can be considered electronic stalking that comes with criminal penalties.

Our attorneys defend clients in the Plant City and Tampa courtrooms in Hillsborough County, FL, and the surrounding counties of Pasco, Pinellas, and Polk County, FL.

Call (813) 250-0500 to discuss your case.


This article was last updated on Thursday, June 29, 2023.