Obtaining a Driver License by Fraud

Complaints of driver’s license and identification card fraud are reported on the “fraud investigation requests” form 72068 (Rev 7/11).

After a complaint, a DL Fraud Section Supervisor with the Bureau of Motorist Services Support for Florida’s DHSMVn will begin an investigation. The investigator might work with an agent from ICE to verify the suspect’s identity. DHSMV uses a Biometric Facial Analysis (BFA) system to analyze images and return matches.

The person suspected of fraud might have their legally obtained driver’s license subjected to a notation on their driver’s license known as;

  • suspension code 45- Obtaining a Driver’s License by Fraud
  • correspondence code 46-COMPLETE EXAM REQ-DEPT RE-EXAM CASE
  • cancellation code 092- ID Card Fraudulently obtained

If probable cause exists to believe the fraud occurred, the DHSMV will take action to suspend the driver’s license of anyone involved in the fraud.

Any person accused of fraud might also face criminal charges. For instance, possessing a fraudulent ID is a third degree felony under Florida Statute Section 322.212. This crime is punishable by up to five (5) years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

The DHSMV is also using facial recognition software to find fraud that occurred long before the four-year statute of limitations for such actions has expired. Innocent people who did not commit fraud are often mistakenly targeted by facial recognition software that isn’t always accurate.

In some cases, a person’s name will change, and that will inadvertently cause a problem when a new DL number is created. We have also seen fraud suspensions triggered by an allegation that a person cheated on the CDL examination. Recently, the DHSMV has threatened to suspend a person’s driver’s license for presenting documents showing their gender is different from the sex assigned at birth.

Attorney for One-Year Fraud Suspensions in Florida

Act quickly. After receiving notice of the suspension, you should immediately retain an attorney to demand a show cause hearing at your local Bureau of Administrative Reviews Office.

You have the right to hire an attorney to request and attend the administrative “show cause” hearing, which is the best and fastest way to fight to get the fraud notation removed.

Before the show cause hearing, we can file a written demand for a copy of any documents used at the hearing and obtain a copy in advance. We bring a court reporter to the show cause hearing.

In some cases, we might call our client to testify at the hearing about the reasons no fraud was committed. If the statute of limitations, the theory of laches, or estoppel applies, then we can assert those defenses and move to invalidate the fraud suspension.

If the hearing offer denies your request, you only have 30 days to file a writ of cert (appeal) with the Circuit Court to get the suspension removed from your driver’s record. Filing a writ after the show cause hearing does NOT alleviate your obligation to file a writ within thirty days of receiving the order of license revocation, suspension, or cancelation.

If you are suspected of fraud, hire an attorney to attend your “hardship” hearing because you will be put under oath and questioned about whether you committed this criminal conduct. That information can be used against you in a criminal fraud investigation by a law enforcement officer.

In many of these cases, the DHMSV does not have enough evidence to uphold the suspension if you contest it. Call an attorney in Tampa, FL, at the Sammis Law Firm if your driver’s license was suspended for fraud.

Let our attorneys for driver’s license fraud allegations put our experience to work for you.

Call (813) 250-0500.


Fraud Suspensions under Florida Statute Section 322.27(1)(d)

The DHSMV takes the position that it may suspend a person’s driving privilege pursuant to §322.27(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2017), without a preliminary hearing. The notation on the driving record says:

SANCTION – OBTAINING A LICENSE BY FRAUD [PENDING SUSPENSION] DHSMV ACTION effective through _____.

Section 322.27(1) (d), Fla. Stat. (2017) reads:

(1) Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in chapter 120, the department is hereby authorized to suspend the license of any person without preliminary hearing upon a showing of its records or other sufficient evident that the licensee:

(d) Has permitted an unlawful or fraudulent use of such license or has knowingly been a party to the obtaining of a license by fraud or misrepresentation or to display, or represent as one’s own, any driver’s license not issued him or her….

Id. (emphasis supplied).

These administrative actions are time-barred by the statute of limitations that would apply to criminal or civil actions.

In Fury v. Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, (Fla. 13th Cir. Ct. 2016), a Circuit Court Judge in Hillsborough County granted a writ of certiorari and required the DHSMV to remove any notation of the suspension from the driving record. The department did not appeal the case to a higher court.

Even if the statute of limitations doesn’t apply to this type of administrative action, in the alternative, the equitable principles of estoppel, waiver, or laches would lead to the same results.

If the Department waits more than four (4) years to take any action after the alleged fraud, the action should be time-barred and dismissed if the proper petition for writ of certiorari is filed. Additionally, the types of due process violations during these hearings might result in a reversal of the DHSMV action because of the writ of certiorari.

A good argument can be made that the entire scheme is inherently unfair and unconstitutional because it involves an improper delegation of legal authority from the Florida legislature to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles without sufficient statutory safeguards having been put in place.


Types of Driver’s License Fraud in Florida

Different types of driver license or identification fraud include:

  • Florida DL / ID Fraud;
  • Misrepresentation;
  • Address Fraud;
  • Certification Fraud (marriage, birth, social security or passport);
  • Counterfeit; or
  • Out of State.

The fraud allegation can also be triggered by a Facial Recognition Scrub Case from FHP / BCII advising that a Probe Image picture for one person’s driver license also matches the picture for another person’s driver license (indicating that one person is using two different names).

We have seen other fraud investigations triggered by the Commercial Driver License Unit for alleged cheating on a CDL exam.


Fraud Suspensions for Mispresenting Gender/Sex

On January 26, 2024, Robert Kynoch, Deputy Executive-Director-HSMV, issued a memo rescinding IR08-Gender Requirements that allowed a person to be issued a new license in the event that a licensee wished to alter the gender marker on their license.

The memo concludes that the term “gender” in Section 322.08 is synonymous with “sex” determined at birth. The memo goes on to state:

“[m]ispresenting one’s gender, understood as sex, on a driver license constitutes fraud under s. 322.212, F.S., and subjects an offender to criminal and civil penalties, including cancelation, suspension, or revocation of their driver’s license, e.g., s. 322.22 and 322.27, F.S.”

Although this appears to be a publicity stunt for political reasons, individuals facing a fraud suspension for attempting to change their gender on their driver’s license might face serious consequences.


DL/ID ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION REPORT

Some fraud investigations are triggered by the fraud investigations requests – form 72068 which requires the victim to disclose whether:

  • they know the imposter or are related to the imposter; or
  • any formal complaint has been made to Law Enforcement or other government entity in connection with this complaint.

The forms are sent to the Fraud Section Room A327 of the FDHSMV at the Neil Kirkman Building in Tallahassee, FL.

In response to the form, the DHSMV will issue a DL/ID ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION REPORT that assigns a fraud case number. The report will summarize the complaint and the facts found during the investigation.

The report will often conclude that based on information received pertaining to the case, the investigation concluded that a person obtained a fraudulent driver’s license in the name of another person.

The report will document that administrative actions were taken by the motorist services which supported the fraud. That action might include:

  1. Fraud correspondence and the verify-ID flag was added to the record
  2. Added suspension 45 – OBTAINING A LICENSE BY FRAUD to the record

DHSMV Actions to Suspend the Driver’s License for Fraud

When fraud is suspected, the DHSMV will add fraud correspondence and “Verify-Identification” flags to both records. This notation will be listed on the driving record as “correspondence,” which will note an action date, citation number, and description that reads “BOLO – CONTRACT.”

The DHSMV will then add a suspension or cancellation to both driving records involved in the case.

The suspension notation will be added to the sanctions section of the driving record that will show the following: Code: 45, Obtaining a License by Fraud, Pending Suspension, DHSMV Action, effective through ___.

The suspension notation will then trigger a letter to the subject’s last known address telling them about their fraud case number. The form letter provides the following information:

You may petition the Department for a show cause hearing to challenge this decision. If you do not wish to challenge this decision, you may petition the Department for a hardship hearing to apply for a restricted driver license.

If approved for a hardship license, or you choose to wait until the suspension is expired, you will be required to be retested and pay all associated fees for the suspension and driver license.

The DHSMV will also issue an “order of license revocation, suspension, or cancellation” signed by the Chief of the Bureau of Records (BOR) and the Director of the Division of Motorist Services that informs the subject that their driving privilege is suspended by the State of Florida, effective on the effective date for a period of one year.

The reason for this action will then be listed as “Obtaining a Driver License by Fraud.”

The notice also explains the process to apply for an administrative hearing to review your record:

If you believe that you have any legal basis to show cause why this action is unjustified, you may request a RECORD REVIEW at which time any argument, other than the validity of a conviction, may be presented to a hearing officer for review. A request for a record review shall not toll the time in which to file a writ of certiorari in accordance with section 322.31 F.S.

In our experience, you can do both – request a show cause hearing and a hardship hearing. And you should do both quickly with the assistance of an attorney. In other words, if you need to drive in Florida while the case is pending, then you need to request a hardship hearing to get the BPO.

Keep in mind that requesting the show cause hearing should NOT interfere with your right to have a hardship license. By doing both, your attorney can fight to get the notation removed from your driving record while you drive to and from work with the hardship license.


The Administrative Hearing after a Fraud Suspension

For fraud suspensions under Section 322.27(1)(d) and 322.32, the “show cause” administrative hearings are by appointment only. You are entitled to hire an attorney to represent you at this hearing. Getting any relief at the hearing without the help of an attorney is difficult.

Request for the administrative “show cause” hearing in writing with a request for a copy of the fraud packet and all documents that the hearing officer will consider at the hearing. You should serve the request to the hearing officer and email the request to fraud@flhsmv.gov.

The hearing officers are trained to schedule the hearing 30 days from the day the application request is made. The hearing officer will email a request for the “fraud packet” from the Fraud Section prior to the hearing. The request must include the office # and supervisor’s name.

The fraud section will send a link to the file on SharePoint to the supervisor or designee in the office. Before the hearing, the driver should request a copy of the packet, and if you are not given a copy of the packet, then when you attend the hearing, make that request again and ask for a continuance so that you have time to review the packet before the hearing.

The refusal to give the driver a copy of the fraud packet can result in a due process violation that can be raised in a writ of cert.

Before the hearing, the driver should request a copy of the packet, and if you are not given a copy of the packet, then when you attend the hearing, make that request again and ask for a continuance so that you have time to review the packet before the hearing. The refusal to give the driver a copy of the fraud packet can result in a due process violation that can be raised in a writ of cert.

If you receive a copy of the packet, your copy will likely be heavily redacted. You should object at the hearing if the hearing officer has an unredacted copy of the packet because this is a violation of due process.

The argument is that, at a minimum, being able to see the documents being used against you is required by due process, and without those documents, you are prejudiced in presenting your defense for specific reasons that you should explain during the show cause hearing.

You should also ask for a copy of the unredacted copy of the packet, although the hearing officer will likely deny this request. Then, renew your objection on due process grounds and move to invalidate on that basis.

Read more about the formal review hearings for DUI cases at the DHSMV in Florida.


DHSMV Fraud Show Cause Hearing Script

The attorneys at the Sammis Law Firm recently attended a show cause hearing after our client’s license was suspended for fraud. We brought a court reporter because we intend to file a writ of cert if the suspension is not set aside.

Through a public record request, we were able to obtain a copy of this script in June of 2018. It provides:

Introduction:

Greet the customer, introduce yourself, and ask the customer to have a seat. Inform the customer that the hearing will be recorded.

I am [H/O Name], HSMV Field Hearing Officer. This hearing is for [Respondent], [DL#], [DL#], in [office location] in Florida. Today’s date is [Date] and the time is [Time]. Your driving privilege is suspended for one year for fraud, with an effective date of [Eff. Date].

This hearing is being held to determine if you knowingly committed fraud.

Opening:

Your hearing today is an informal proceeding of an administrative nature, therefore, judicial procedures do not apply. Section 322.27(1)(d), Florida Statutes, authorizes the department to suspend the driving privilege if it is determined an individual has permitted unlawful or fraudulent use of such license or has knowingly been a party to the obtaining of a license by fraud or misrepresentation, or to display, or represent as one’s own any driver license not issued to him or her.

The purpose of the hearing is for you to present any new evidence indicating you did not knowingly commit fraud.

Before we continue, I must place you under oath. Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

For the record, please state your name, date of birth, and current address.

Ms. / Mr. Name are you represented by legal counsel?

Identify attorney(s) and witnesses:

Counsel, please identify yourself for the record. Please state your name and business address.

(If there are other people present, have them introduce themselves for the record. Have each witness state their name and address. If they are going to testify make sure you administer the oath to them.)

Enter the Fraud Report into the record:

State exhibit 1 – Fraud investigation report completed by: (state what agency completed fraud investigation and report)

“Ms. / Mr. Name, have you had an opportunity to review this report?”

(Allow driver/attorney time to review the report if necessary)

Allow the driver/attorney to present their case:

(At this time allow testimony, documents, and other relevant evidence to be submitted on behalf of the driver.)

“Ms. / Mr. Name, please present evidence as to why your driving privileges should not be suspended.”

(If documents are submitted by the driver/attorney accept them as Driver’s exhibit 1, 2 etc. to be considered).

Conclusion

“This concludes the hearing for Name. All evidence will be considered and you will be advised of the results within thirty (30) days from today.”


DHSMV Fraud Hardship Hearing Report / Script

The attorneys at the Sammis Law Firm recently attended a hardship hearing after our client’s license was suspended for fraud. We were provided with a copy of the “Fraud Hardship Hearing Report / Script” used by the hearing officer. According to the form, the DHSMV created this form on 5/2017. It provides:

Fraud Hardship Hearing Report / Script

CDLIS Check:

CCIS Check:

Proof of identity / Real ID documents provided:

Great the customer and inform him/ her that the hearing will be recorded.

“Good Morning / Afternoon. I am _______, HSMV Field Hearing Office. This hearing is for __________, whose driver’s license number is ________________________. This hearing is taking place in the Tampa Office of the Bureau of Administrative Review. Today’s date is ___________ and time is ___________. This hearing is regarding the suspension for fraud, with the effective date of ________________, expiring on _____________.

Witnesses:_________

Attorney:__________

Interpreter:________

“Your hearing today is an informal proceeding of an administrative nature, therefore, judicial procedures do not apply. Florida Statute Section 322.271 gives the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV) the authority to conduct your hardship hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to allow you and the department an opportunity to evaluate your driving record and to determine whether a hardship license should be granted.

Applying for and/or acceptance of a hardship license, if approved, does not require nor constitute an admission of guilty to any charges or allegations of fraud.

Before we begin this hearing, I must place you under oath; please raise your right hand.

“Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? For the record, please state your full name, date of birth, and current address.”

Review driving record with the customer, including current and past sanctions, convictions, and crashes.

Do you currently have a driver license in your possession?

Have you ever been licensed in any other state or country?

Has your driver license ever been suspended / revoked in any other state or country?

If yes, for what reason?

Have you had any other violations / convictions / revocations / suspensions that have not been mentioned?

If so, what are they?

What are your driving needs?

How many licensed drivers are in your household?

How have your driving needs been met during this suspension?

What other means of transportation are available to you?

Approved through:

Database / FDLIS updated:

D300 issued:

Restricted:

C- Business Purpose Only

D – Employment Purposes Only

Reinstatement / License Fee: $____

Advise customer of required documents and tests or reason for denial.


Obtaining a Driver License by Fraud – Section 322.212(5)(a)

Obtaining a driver license by fraud in violation of Section 322.212(5)(a) is considered a felony of the third degree pursuant to Section 322.212(6). Any criminal action brought by the state may be time-barred under the Statute of Limitations.

The department will argue that the statute of limitations applies to a criminal case but not fraud suspensions. If that is true, the parallel equitable principles of estoppel, waiver, and laches would apply.

The bottom line is that if the Department waits longer than four (4) years, then the court can bar them from taking any action, although you would need to file a writ of cert within 30 days of the notice of suspension to assert this defense.

If you wait until the 30 days to file the petition for writ of certiorari, then the court has no jurisdiction to overturn the fraud suspension.


Suspension of a Driver License Based on Fraud under Section 322.27

Likewise, the suspension of a driver license based on fraud is a sanction provided by Section 322.27, Fla. Stat. Courts consider such a sanction to be related to an ancillary criminal action regarding the same conduct.

The show cause hearing regarding the license suspension was to determine whether a sanction on a driver license was warranted based on the subject’s fraud in obtaining a driver license. Although it is an administrative proceeding, it is still governed by time limitations applicable to civil actions and proceedings.

In many of these cases, the subject is not afforded due process or given adequate notice of the allegation of fraud in allegedly obtaining two driver licenses in different names.

The Department takes the position that the subject’s attorney is only permitted an in camera inspection of the unredacted privileged records prior to and during the show cause hearing. Under those circumstances, the due process rights of the Petitioner are violated.

First, the Department often fails to comply with its obligations to provide the unredacted records sought through a public records request. Any failure to comply with a public records request could also result in a separate suit under Chapter 119 and an accelerated hearing pursuant to Section 119.11, Fla. Stat. If the court ordered an inspection of the unredacted records, then the subject would be entitled to inspect such records within 48 hours of the date of the order.

The Department’s response to the public record request is often to redact information. The DHSMV takes the position that driver license photographs are considered privileged and not properly subject to disclosure pursuant to a public records request.

The Department’s records contain all the information obtained throughout the years every time a driver obtained, replaced, or renewed a driver license, including the digital images, signatures, social security number, and address.

During the Writ of Certiorari, the DHSMV will often file a Notice of Confidential Records Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d)(1)(B)(vi), and 11 (d)(2)(A), and Motion to Seal Confidential Information Contained in Respondent’s Response Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(g)(1).

In these motions, the Department will argue that these records are exempt from public disclosure unless one of the exceptions to such disclosure is present. Disclosure of personal information is prohibited unless for a purpose permitted by an exception listed in one of 14 statutory subsections. See 18 U.S.C.S. § 2721(b)(1)-(14).

Section 119.0712(2)(b), Fla. Stat., (2016), provides that:

Personal information, including highly restricted personal information as defined in 18 U.S.C. s. 2725, contained in a motor vehicle record is confidential pursuant to the federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act of 1994 [(“DPPA”)], 18 U.S.C. ss. 2721 et seq. Such information may be released only as authorized by that act . . . .

Id.

Additionally, 18 U.S.C. §2725(3), defines personal information as: “information that identifies an individual, including an individual’s photograph, social security number, driver identification number, name, address (but not the 5-digit zip code), telephone number, and medical or disability information, but does not include information on vehicular accidents, driving violations, and driver’s status.”

“Highly restricted personal information” means an individual’s photograph or image, social security number, or medical or disability information. See 18 U.S.C. §2725(4).

The DHSMV will also take the position that once the Court issued the Order to Show Cause, the Department could then rely on one of the exceptions to preemption of these records; i.e., a court order or proceeding to which Respondent could file the records under seal. See 18 U.S.C.S. § 2721(b)(1), and (4); see also §322.142(4)(a)1., Fla. Stat.


Additional Resources

Driver License Fraud Suspension in Florida – These fraud suspensions are so common that the Driver License Office in Bradenton, FL, recently published a handout on fraud suspensions –  Susp_Fraud – Last Update: 07/24/2017. The handout is for people who have been “convicted” of committing driver’s license fraud (identity theft) and received notice that their driving privilege has been suspended for one (1) year. The publication explains only two options to clear this suspension and reinstate your driver license without any mention of requesting a show cause hearing or filing a petition for writ of certiorari. The only two stated options are waiting out the suspension period and then scheduling an appointment to retake all *written exams for your particular license class, retaking the Driving Skills Road Test at the discretion of the Division of Driver Licenses, and paying the $51.25 reinstatement fee. The other option is applying to the bar for early reinstatement of hardship privileges. The publication provides that if BAR approves your application for a hardship license, you will be issued a driver’s license with a specific restriction, and mailed from Central Issuance in Tallahassee. If BAR approves the application, you must set an appointment to process the transaction so the restricted license can be issued.

How to Reinstate the Driver License after the “Fraudulently Obtaining” Suspension – Visit the website of the FLHSMV website to find frequently asked questions about how to reinstate a driver’s license after a one-year suspension for “fraudulently obtaining” a driver’s license. According to the website, the applicant may petition the department for a hearing to determine whether or not fraud has been committed. If not, then the suspension will be removed. If fraud is proven, the subject may apply for a hardship license. If approved for hardship, or if the time has expired, a test must be taken, a suspension reinstatement fee, and any applicable license fees.


Facial Recognition Scrub Case from FHP / BCII

The fraud allegation can also be triggered by a Facial Recognition Scrub Case from FHP / BCII advising that a Probe Image picture for one person’s driver license also matches the picture for another person’s driver license (indicating that one person fraudulently obtained a driver’s license in another person’s name).

Help with facial recognition technology is provided by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA).

Founded in 1933, AAMVA is a community of motor vehicle and law enforcement agencies in North America that represents member interests in a variety of forums, including driver and vehicle licensing.

AAMVA engages motor vehicle and law enforcement agencies and the private sector to advance driver license, vehicle title, motor carrier, highway safety, security, identification, and enforcement practice.

The data is put into various databases, including the Problem Driver Pointer System (PDPS). Those databases allow law enforcement agencies and other organizations to search the National Driver Register (NDR) data.


Attorney for the Order of License Suspension under § 322.271(1)(a)

If you received an Order of License Revocation, Suspension, or Cancellation, the order places you on notice that the Department is suspending your driver license based upon an allegation of fraud, including an allegation that you previously obtained a driver license by fraud.

When the Department tries to suspend your license based upon a summary review of its own records under § 322.271(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017), you need an attorney to help you fight to invalidate that action during a show cause hearing or a writ of cert.

Our criminal defense attorneys are experienced in contesting such actions by the DHSMV. We can help you safeguard your procedural rights and ensure there is no due process violation.

Call (813) 250-0500.


This article was last updated on Tuesday, January 30, 2024.