Hospital Blood Test in DUI Prosecutions
If your blood was taken at the hospital, can it later be used as evidence to prosecute you for DUI? The short answer is “Maybe.
In a few cases, the investigating officer will immediately get a warrant and then come into the hospital to seize the blood sample taken by the medical professional. In Florida, the use of a subpoena for that purpose is relatively rare.
The more common situation arises when the prosecutor seeks a subpoena to obtain the notation in the medical records showing the BAC level. If the prosecutor gets the medical records, the prosecutor can attempt to use those records against the defendant in a criminal prosecution for DUI-related crimes.
Before the prosecutor can get the records through a subpoena, the prosecutor must provide the patient with written notice of their intention to issue the subpoena at the patient’s last known address. That notice can be issued either before or after any arrest has been made.
If you received such a notice, your criminal defense attorney can object to the subpoena being issued which then triggers the so-called “Hunter Hearing.”
During the Hunter Hearing, your attorney can argue all of the reasons that a subpoena for the blood test results should not be issued. Even if the prosecutor gets the records, your attorney can fight to keep those records out of evidence at trial.
The blood alcohol concentration of the serum blood is usually listed in the reports under “ETOH (ethanol) Lvl (level) 0.—% HI (high).” Keep in mind that for medical purposes, the BAC is calculated using a plasma (serum) blood sample while the legal BAC is calculated using whole blood.
The hospital will usually perform a blood plasma (serum) test instead of testing whole blood. The plasma blood test is performed on the liquid portion of a drawn blood sample after the solid cellular components have been removed. Because the alcohol is concentrated in a serum sample, it is higher than a whole blood sample.
The narrative sections of the medical records might say “severe intoxication” or the “blood alcohol was ____.”
For a legal blood test, the test is performed on whole blood or blood that has not been broken down into solid and liquid components.
Attorneys for DUI Hospital Blood Tests in Tampa, FL
An attorney can help you understand how a hospital blood test might impact your criminal case. We can help you learn more about the difference between a whole blood test and a blood plasma (serum) test.
The distinction between the hospital blood and the legal blood becomes important when considering the reported BAC results because a plasma test will produce a result that is more than 10–15% higher than a whole blood test drawn at the same time.
Expert testimony is usually required to explain how the plasma BAC would equate to a determination of whole blood BAC.
The DHSMV should NOT be able to base an administrative suspension on a hospital blood draw, but unless you demand a formal review hearing within 10 days after the suspension is triggered, you waive the right to contest that issue.
Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney at Sammis Law Firm in Tampa, FL.
Call (813) 250-0500.
Are Hospital Blood Tests Admissible in DUI Cases in Florida?
In 2000, the supreme court answered a certified question from the Fourth District which established that records of hospital blood tests can be admitted in DUI cases. See Baber v. State, 775 So. 2d 258, 382 (Fla. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1022 (2001).
After the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the predicate steps necessary to introduce such evidence are far more complicated in order to satisfy the requirements of confrontation, see Johnson v. State, 929 So. 2d 4, 7-8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), but it remains clear that such medical tests can be relevant to establish a DUI.
Given the differences between legal blood tests and medical or serum blood tests, at a minimum, a hospital blood test may need to be supported by additional expert evidence to be relevant and admissible in a case under a blood-alcohol theory.
But in a case under an impairment theory, medical or serum blood tests are more likely to be admissible with a lesser degree of expert testimony. See J.J. Paul, III, DWI: Blood, Tests & Fears: A Crash Course in Blood Alcohol Samples, 25 Champion 39 (June 2001); Carol A. Roehrenbeck & Raymond W. Russell, Blood is Thicker than Water: What You Need to Know to Challenge a Serum Blood Alcohol Result, 8 Crim. Just. 14 (Fall 1993).
DUI can be established under several alternative theories. In cases involving alcohol intoxication, a prima facie case can be established by proof that a person operating or in actual physical control of a vehicle is “under the influence of alcohol . . . to the extent that [his or her] normal faculties are impaired,” § 316.193(1)(a), Fla. Stat.
Alternatively, it can be established under a theory that the person has “a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood,” § 316.193(1)(b), or the person has “a breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.” § 316.193(1)(c).
Challenges to Fight the Medical Blood Test
The defense can file a motion to exclude the medical blood test results when the prosecutor seeks to admit this evidence. In many cases, the prosecutor will obtain the medical records that contain a notation about the blood test results.
The criminal defense attorney will then object to the results of the hospital’s BAC test performed for the purposes of medical treatment. Those objections might center around the notation in the medical records being hearsay, irrelevant, or are in violation of the confrontation clause.
Although the notation of a BAC level in the hospital records are hearsay, the state will often argue that the blood test results in the medical records are a business record exception. That exception only applies if the blood report is untrustworthy.
The defense can challenge the trustworthiness of the hospital records by evidence from the quality control records of the hospital through its lab director including the maintenance log, package insert and method of the alcohol measuring instrument.
Many hospitals use the VITROS 950 or similar types of preliminary tests. The hospital lab director will often admit that the hospital blood tests are not scientifically accurate but are merely used as screening tests to determine approximate levels of alcohol in order to evaluate the patient’s condition and to prescribe medications.
The defense can often call its own expert including a Forensic Toxicologist to show that the BAL in the medical records are not consistent with the patient’s clinical presentation. The defense expert can also explain the testing method as specified in the manufacturer’s instructions which disclose the reportable dynamic range of the VITROS alcohol device was up to 300 MG/DL.
If the patient’s reading is “out of range” and was subject to “sample dilution” then it must be retested according to the manufacturer. When no sample dilution was performed and the hospital ignored the manufacturer’s instructions to confirm the results by gas chromatograph, then the hospital blood specimen might contain a possible false-positive result caused by a crush injury.
In many of these cases, the hospital testing lacked quality control when there is no proper chain of custody to prevent a source of contamination of the specimen and the hospital used serum, not whole blood.
The blood tests in these cases do not always comply with the common law for scientific tests because no three-prong proper predicate can be established. That predicate requires a showing of the following:
- the test was reliable;
- the test was performed by a qualified operator with the proper equipment; and
- expert testimony was presented concerning the meaning of the test.
See State v. Bender, 382 So.2d 697, 699 (Fla.1980).
The results might not be reliable because it involved the extraction of arterial rather than venous blood, an alcohol swab was used at the extraction site, and the testing method resulted in mistaking other chemicals in the blood for alcohol. Many of these tests are performed without any of the safeguards that would be present in a forensic laboratory.
Actual deficiencies in this particular test can be shown. In many of these cases, the prosecution has very little information about who extracted the blood or their qualifications.
In some cases, the prosecutor has not listed an expert who can testify about the meaning of the test by converting the serum blood alcohol result into a whole blood alcohol reading that would indicate significant alcohol intoxication.
Other problems can result when there is an insufficient showing of the chain of custody. In many cases, the blood alcohol test report is for medical purposes only and the testing parameters do not meet requirements for legal interpretation.
How to Convert Serum and Plasma Results to Whole Blood
Since it represents the water portion of whole blood, serum or plasma will have a higher AC than the whole blood from which it is derived.
This means that serum and plasma alcohol results must be reduced to obtain a whole blood equivalent. The average ratio of serum and plasma AC to whole blood AC is approximately 1.14:1 (range 1.04:1 – 1.26:1).
To convert a serum alcohol concentration to a whole blood equivalent:
If necessary, convert the units to g/100 mL.
mg/dL = mg/100 mL
mg/100 mL = g/100 mL
120 mg/dL = 0.120 g/100 mL
Convert serum alcohol concentration (SAC) to an equivalent whole blood concentration (your witness may use a different average ratio than 1.14:1): Whole Blood AC = SAC /1.14.
0.120 = 0.105 g/100 mL = average whole blood equivalent
Conversion Between Alcohol Concentrations in Whole, Plasma, and Serum Blood
Enzymatic assay testing is used in hospitals for determining the alcohol concentration in plasma or serum. The plasma is gathered when whole blood is centrifuged or spun and the red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets are removed.
The serum is gathered in the same way except that coagulation proteins are also removed.
The result of the plasma or serum for alcohol concentration will return a result that is 16-25% higher than the alcohol concentration in whole blood.
Different conversion numbers are used by different experts. The most common range used is .13 to .20. In some cases, a technical supervisor will use .16.
For example, if a .10 serum/plasma alcohol concentration is converted to a whole blood alcohol concentration, the following calculations will result:
- .10 / 1.25 = .080
- .10 / 1.20 = .083
- .10 / 1.18 = .084
- .10 / 1.16 = .086
Medical Records are Protected as Private by the Florida Constitution
Under the Florida Constitution, medical records are protected as private. Article I, section 23’s guarantee that “[e]very natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into the person’s private life” has been held to protect an individual privacy interest in medical records. See State v. Rivers, 787 So.2d 952, 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing Hunter v. State, 639 So.2d 72, 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)).
To overcome a person’s right to keep his or her medical records private, the prosecutor with the State of Florida is obligated to prove that it has a compelling interest in having the records disclosed. Id. at 953.
One way in which the prosecutor with the State Attorney’s Office can carry that burden is to prove that the medical records are relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation. See Rivers, 787 So.2d at 953.
A trial court departs from the essential requirements of law when it allows disclosure of medical records absent such proof (or proof of some other compelling interest). Id.
In Faber v. State, 157 So.3d 429, 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), the court granted a certiorari petition where the trial court allowed disclosure of medical records in response to the State’s request. In that case, the appellate court held that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law where it authorized a subpoena for medical records where “the State presented an insufficient nexus to establish the relevance” of the records.
In Tyson v. State, 114 So.3d 443, 444-45 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013), the court granted certiorari relief where “the State did not present evidence to establish relevancy.”
As the court framed the issue in Rivers, the dispositive question is whether the State has presented a “reasonable founded suspicion” that the records it seeks are relevant to an ongoing investigation. 787 So.2d at 953.
The State must show a “nexus” between the medical records the State seeks and some material issue in the case by:
- identifying some theory that reasonably makes the records relevant; and
- producing some evidence that makes it reasonable to expect that the records will produce evidence that supports the theory.
Faber, 157 So.3d at 431 (requiring that the State demonstrate a “nexus” between the records and some relevant issue).
DUI Defense Lawyers for Blood Test in Florida
If your driving under the influence (DUI) cases involves blood testing, then contact an experienced DUI defense lawyer in Tampa, Florida.
The attorneys at Sammis Law Firm in Tampa, FL, are experienced in representing clients throughout the Tampa Bay area.
Find out more about the charges pending against you, the method used for your DUI blood test, and defenses that might apply to your case.
Our main office is located in downtown Tampa, FL. We also have a second office located in New Port Richey across from the West Pasco Judicial Center.
Call (813) 250-0500 to discuss your case.
This article was last updated on Tuesday, October 1, 2019.